August 1, 2012

  • Obama Care contains implanted microchips

    I copied this from the Health Care Bill

    Subtitle C—National Medical
    10 Device Registry
    11 SEC. 2521. NATIONAL MEDICAL DEVICE REGISTRY.
    12 (a) REGISTRY.—
    13 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 519 of the Federal
    14 Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 360i) is
    15 amended—
    16 (A) by redesignating subsection (g) as sub-
    17 section (h); and
    18 (B) by inserting after subsection (f) the
    19 following:
    20 ‘‘National Medical Device Registry
    21 ‘‘(g)(1) The Secretary shall establish a national med-
    22 ical device registry (in this subsection referred to as the
    23 ‘registry’) to facilitate analysis of postmarket safety and
    24 outcomes data on each device that—
    25 ‘‘(A) is or has been used in or on a patient; and
    F:P11NHITRICOMMAAHCA09_001.XML
    f:VHLC7140971409.140.xml (444390|2)1002
    1 ‘‘(B) is—
    2 ‘‘(i) a class III device; or
    3 ‘‘(ii) a class II device that is implantable,
    4 life-supporting, or life-sustaining.
    5 ‘‘(2) In developing the registry, the Secretary shall,
    6 in consultation with the Commissioner of Food and Drugs,
    7 the Administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
    8 Services, the head of the Office of the National Coordi-
    9 nator for Health Information Technology, and the Sec-
    10 retary of Veterans Affairs, determine the best methods
    11 for—
    12 ‘‘(A) including in the registry, in a manner con-
    13 sistent with subsection (f), appropriate information
    14 to identify each device described in paragraph (1) by
    15 type, model, and serial number or other unique iden-
    16 tifier;
    17 ‘‘(B) validating methods for analyzing patient
    18 safety and outcomes data from multiple sources and
    19 for linking such data with the information included
    20 in the registry as described in subparagraph (A), in-
    21 cluding, to the extent feasible, use of—
    22 ‘‘(i) data provided to the Secretary under
    23 other provisions of this chapter; and
    24 ‘‘(ii) information from public and private
    25 sources identified under paragraph (3);
    F:P11NHITRICOMMAAHCA09_001.XML
    f:VHLC7140971409.140.xml (444390|2)1003
    1 ‘‘(C) integrating the activities described in this
    2 subsection with—
    3 ‘‘(i) activities under paragraph (3) of sec-
    4 tion 505(k) (relating to active postmarket risk
    5 identification);
    6 ‘‘(ii) activities under paragraph (4) of sec-
    7 tion 505(k) (relating to advanced analysis of
    8 drug safety data); and
    9 ‘‘(iii) other postmarket device surveillance
    10 activities of the Secretary authorized by this
    11 chapter; and
    12 ‘‘(D) providing public access to the data and
    13 analysis collected or developed through the registry
    14 in a manner and form that protects patient privacy
    15 and proprietary information and is comprehensive,
    16 useful, and not misleading to patients, physicians,
    17 and scientists.
    18 ‘‘(3)(A) To facilitate analyses of postmarket safety
    19 and patient outcomes for devices described in paragraph
    20 (1), the Secretary shall, in collaboration with public, aca-
    21 demic, and private entities, develop methods to—
    22 ‘‘(i) obtain access to disparate sources of
    23 patient safety and outcomes data, including—
    24 ‘‘(I) Federal health-related electronic
    25 data (such as data from the Medicare proVerDate 
    F:P11NHITRICOMMAAHCA09_001.XML
    f:VHLC7140971409.140.xml (444390|2)1004
    1 gram under title XVIII of the Social Secu-
    2 rity Act or from the health systems of the
    3 Department of Veterans Affairs);
    4 ‘‘(II) private sector health-related
    5 electronic data (such as pharmaceutical
    6 purchase data and health insurance claims
    7 data); and
    8 ‘‘(III) other data as the Secretary
    9 deems necessary to permit postmarket as-
    10 sessment of device safety and effectiveness;

Comments (15)

  • Such a wonderful law, isn’t it? 

    /sarcasm

  • This is talking about identifying implants that people have had done medically… like a pacemaker or etc. That’s diff from what your title suggests.

  • This has been clearly identified as a hoax being circulated on the internet. 

    http://metabunk.org/threads/497-Debunked-Obamacare-RFID-Chip-Implant-Law-Hoax

  • @vexations - How can it be a hoax if it is part of the actual law?

  • It can be because people post a number of hoaxes on the internet.  Check out your sources.  That is what I do.  Here is what snopes has to say about it.

    http://www.snopes.com/politics/medical/microchip.asp@PrisonerxOfxLove - 

  • @vexations - We’re reading directly from the bill. Why do you need other people to tell you what to think?

    Of course the bill doesn’t mandate chips for all people!

    But the bill clearly lays the legal foundation for government information gathering from the doctor-patient relationship.

    What business does government have butting it’s nose into our personal medical business and gathering information about us from the medical procedures we undergo?

  • @vexations - I went to the actual bill and posted it for you to read.  Doesn’t look like a hoax to me. 

  • @vexations - snopes isn’t last word

  • @PrisonerxOfxLove - It does lay the ground work for government info gathering – so true.  I watched C-Span a few years ago- I listened as a Senator was proposing a bill that would make it a requirement for all infants to have a surgically implanted chip.  He went on to say that this would help in fighing child abduction. 

  • Laying the foundation and actually doing that are two different things.  No way this will ever happen!  If it is in the bill the public reaction would force our legislation to overturn it.  Someone is spreading scare tactics.  I’ve read the bill and I do not draw the same conclusion you have. So you guys were just sitting around today and decided to read the law on Obamacare and no one prompted you to garner this idea from what you read.  Some how I find that hard to believe.  @PrisonerxOfxLove - 

  • The Secretary of Health is our former governor of Kansas.  She directly contributed to the deaths of many unborn children by politically protecting George Tiller, who personally killed thousands of babies.  She is not the person I want holding all this power over me.  

  • @PrisonerxOfxLove -  Interesting post, but just a quick thought here. This bill sounds vague and otherwise open to interpertation. It could spell out a lot of things to a lot of different types of people (sort of like the bible which creates all theese diferent forms of Christianity based on interpertation). I don’t think I would worry just yet. Besides if you are worried about the “mark of the beast” based on the bibles direct words it has to be taken voluntairly along with direct renunciation of God or else it does not quilify as such. I would be much more worried about the new technology that is being used in big cities to implement 360 degree cameras with facial recognision software to identify people in any given place at any given time along with the stupid scan codes on the back of drivers lisenses that places are now regestering with the government everything you eat, drink and or do that involves asking for an ID (ie:  go to a bar, have one drink too many in too little of time and the system knows it. Not only that but it will report you, track you and trace you right down to your liscense plate number so that authorities can be notified and be waiting for you a block down the road) (plus who the hell wants the govt. knowing everything about us anyway? Is Orwells 1984 really that close for us?). Doubt me? It is happening in STL and IL RIGHT NOW. Think you are safe? Actually most people aren’t as safe as they think. THere are probably tens of “little crimes” eash and everyone of us commit on a regular basis and simply don’t even realize it (that is until we are tracked, which is NOW).

  • @feedwaterclean -  They are ALL bad and corupt. Somehow someone (with a LOT of money) needs to get their crap together and start a campaign to only vote independent in 2016 which would get all (at least most) of the bad people out and give us a chance to start over.

Post a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *